metal detection Archives - AUTOMATION INSIGHTS

Overcoming Challenges in Metal Detection: The Power of Factor 1 Sensors

Standard inductive proximity sensors are used across the automation industry for metal detection applications and are generally reliable in these operations. But issues arise when switching from steel to other metals like copper, brass, or aluminum. A standard inductive sensor may encounter problems in such scenarios. Due to the reduction factor, the standard inductive sensor detects these different metals at different distances. If you had a sensor mounted and set up to sense a steel material but switched to copper, for example, the copper material might be out of the sensor’s range due to this difference in reduction factor, resulting in a missed reading. Factor 1 sensors were created to eliminate this problem.

Reduction factor

The reduction factor is the root cause of variable distance readings with a standard inductive sensor. But what exactly is it? The standard operating range of an inductive proximity sensor is determined by its response to a one-millimeter-thick square piece of mild steel. Other metals like copper and aluminum deviate from this standard range due to differences in material properties. For example, copper has a reduction factor of around 0.4, so it can only be detected at 0.4 times the standard operating range of an inductive proximity sensor.

We can save for later the details of why this occurs, but the key point here is that different material properties cause different reduction factors, which result in different switching distances. The table below shows these different reduction factors and switching distances. Factor 1 sensors take all these variable reduction factors and equalize them to a standard operating distance. This means that you can read anything from copper to steel at the same range, reducing the possibility of missed readings and eliminating the need for repositioning sensors whenever a material change occurs.

When to use Factor 1 sensors

Factor 1 sensors are well-suited for any process that involves different metals. Whether it is automated welding or a packaging conveyor, the factor 1 sensor will keep the material switching ranges uniform. But why is this such a big advantage?

Think about the time spent having to adjust sensor distances. Not only is the task annoying, it also takes up time. Having factor 1 sensors in place will increase the uptime of these processes and eliminate the need for sensor adjustments.

One last benefit to note about factor 1 sensors is that they are inherently weld field immune. The internal construction of the sensor prevents it from being affected by the electromagnetic field generated during welding. This additional immunity allows the sensor to survive in these welding conditions where a typical sensor might fail if it comes in proximity to the weld field.

In the end, you know your application best, but if any of the above benefits resonate with you, it’s time to start thinking about factor 1.

Sensing Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Metals: Enhancing Material Differentiation

Detecting metallic (ferrous) objects is a common application in many industries, including manufacturing, automotive, and aerospace. Inductive sensors are a popular choice for detecting metallic objects because they are reliable, durable, and cost-effective. Detecting a metallic object, however, is not always as simple as it seems, especially if you need to differentiate between two metallic objects. In such cases, it is crucial to understand the properties of the metals you are trying to detect, including whether they are ferrous or non-ferrous.

Ferrous vs. non-ferrous

Ferrous metals, such as mild steel, carbon steel, stainless steel, cast iron, and wrought iron, contain iron. They are typically magnetic, heavier, and more likely to corrode than non-ferrous metals, which do not contain iron. Aluminum, copper, lead, zinc, nickel, titanium, and cobalt are examples of non-ferrous metals. They are typically nonmagnetic, lightweight, and less likely to corrode.

Sensing ferrous and non-ferrous metal:

When it comes to detecting ferrous and non-ferrous metals using inductive sensors, the reduction factor plays a crucial role. The reduction factor is the ratio of the sensor’s effective sensing distance for a given metal to the sensor’s effective sensing distance for steel. In other words, it is the degree to which a metal affects the sensing range of an inductive sensor. Ferrous metals typically have less of an effect on sensing range than non-ferrous metals because inductive sensors function based on the law of induction, and magnetic metals are more likely to interact with the magnetic field created by the sensor.

The reduction factor for each type of metal varies depending on the metal’s properties. Ferrous metals typically have a higher reduction factor than non-ferrous metals, which means they can be detected from a greater distance. For example, both steel and stainless steel have a reduction factor of 0.6 to 1, which means they can be detected from the full switching distance of the sensor of 4 mm. In contrast, non-ferrous metals, such as aluminum, copper, and brass, have a lower reduction factor of 0.25 to 0.5, which means they can only be detected from a fraction of the operating switching distance, typically 1 to 2 mm.

Understanding the reduction factor for each metal allows you to answer the question of what happens when you need to differentiate between two metallic parts. If one metal is ferrous and the other is non-ferrous, then you can place the sensor at a distance that will detect the ferrous metal but not the non-ferrous metal. However, this may not be an efficient solution if the metals have similar reduction factors, or if you need to detect the non-ferrous metal over the ferrous metal.

Using ferrous-only or non-ferrous-only sensors

The better solution is to use a ferrous-only or non-ferrous-only sensor. These sensors are specifically designed to detect only one type of metal and ignore the other type, resulting in a reduction factor of zero. Ferrous-only sensors detect only ferrous metals, and their reduction factors range from 0.1 to 1 for steel and stainless steel, while the reduction factors for non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, copper, and brass are zero. Non-ferrous-only sensors detect only non-ferrous metals, and their reduction factors range from 0.9 to 1.1 for aluminum, copper, and brass, while the reduction factors for ferrous metals are zero. Using ferrous-only or non-ferrous-only sensors eliminates the need to adjust the mounting distance of a standard inductive sensor to detect a ferrous metal over a non-ferrous metal.

Overall, selecting the right sensor for your application depends on the type of metals you need to differentiate and detect. If you are dealing with ferrous and non-ferrous metals, you can use a standard inductive sensor, but you need to be aware of the reduction factor for each metal type and adjust the mounting distance accordingly. If you need to detect only one type of metal, however, a ferrous-only or a non-ferrous-only sensor is the better option. These sensors are specially designed to ignore the other metal type, eliminating the need to adjust the mounting distance.

By understanding the differences between ferrous and non-ferrous metals and the capabilities of different sensors, you can optimize the metal detection system for maximum efficiency and accuracy.

Shedding Light on Different Types of Photoelectric Sensors

Photoelectric sensors have been around for more than 50 years and are used in everyday things – from garage door openers to highly automated assembly lines that produce the food we eat and the cars we drive.

The correct use of photoelectric sensors in a manufacturing process is important to ensure machines can perform their required actions. Over the years they have evolved into many different forms.

But, how do you know which is the right sensor for your application? Let’s take a quick look at the different types and why you would choose one over another for your needs.

Diffuse sensors

- Ideal for detecting contrast differences, depending on the surface, color, and material
- Detects in Light-On or Dark-On mode, depending on the target
- Economical and easy to mount and align, thanks to visible light beams
- Shorter ranges as compared to retroreflective and through-beam sensors
- IR (Infrared) light beams available for better detection in harsh environments
- Laser light versions are available for more precise detection when needed
- Mounting includes only one electrical device

Diffuse sensor with background suppression

- Reliable object detection with various operating ranges, and independent of surface, color, and material
- Detects objects against very similar backgrounds – even if they are very dark against a bright background
- Almost constant scanning range even with different reflectance
- Only one electrical device without reflectors or separate receivers
- Good option if you cannot use a through-beam or retroreflective sensor
- With red light or the laser red light that is ideally suited for detecting small parts

Retroreflective sensors

- Simple alignment thanks to generous mounting tolerances
- Large reflectors for longer ranges
- Reliable detection, regardless of surface, color, and material
- Polarized light filters are available to assist with detecting shiny objects
- Mounting includes only one electrical device, plus a reflector
- Most repeatable sensor for clear object detection; light passes through clear target 2X’s giving a greater change in light received by the sensor

Through-beam sensors

- Ideal for positioning tasks, thanks to excellent reproducibility
- Most reliable detection method for objects, especially on conveyor applications
- Extremely resistant to contamination and suitable for harsh environments
- Ideally suited for large operating ranges
- Transmitter and receiver in separate housings

Fork sensors

- Different light types (red light, infrared, laser)
- Robust metal housing
- Simple alignment to the object
- High optical resolution and reproducibility
- Fork widths in different sizes with standardized mounting holes
- Identical mechanical and optical axes
- The transmitter and receiver are firmly aligned to each other, yielding high process reliability

The next time you need to choose a photoelectric sensor for your manufacturing process, consider these features of each type to ensure the sensor is performing optimally in your application.

The Latest Trend in the Stamping and Die Industry

One trend we see today in many applications is the need for smaller low profile proximity sensors. Machines are getting much smaller and the need for error proofing has ultimately become a must for such applications in the Stamping and Die industry. Stamping Die processes can be a very harsh environment with excessive change overs to high speed part feed outs when running production. In many cases these applications need a sensor that can provide 5mm of sensing range however they simply do not have the room for an M18 sensor that is 45 to 50mm long. This is where the “FlatPack” low profile sensor can be a great choice due to their low profile dimensions.

Proximity sensors have proven time and time again to reduce machine crashes, part accuracy and proper part location. Sensors can be placed in multiple locations within the application to properly error proof “In Order Parts” (IO) for example detecting whether a punched hole is present or not present to ensure a production part is good. All of this adds up to reduced machine downtime and lower scrap rates that simply help a plant run more efficiently.

So when selecting proximity sensors and mating cables it is very important to select a sensor that A) mechanically fits the application and B) offers enough sensing range detection to reliably see the target without physical damage to the sensor. Remember, these sensors are proximity sensors not positive machine stops. Cables are also key to applications, it is important to pick a the proper cable needed for example an abrasion resistant cable may be needed due to excessive metal debris or a TPE cable for high flex areas.

Below both sensors have 5mm of sensing range: