Inductive coupling is not new to automation. The concept in various forms has been around for over few decades. It was not actively used, and my guess is that more than form factor or functionality of couplers, it has to do with automation technology relying on mechanical and hard wired components. With growing complexity and ever evolving technology, the inductive coupling has also evolved. Nowadays, you can charge your smart phones or tablets using the charging pad that uses the very same technology.
In industrial automation space, inductive sensors are very popular and commonly used for detecting proximity of metal objects such as food cans, or machine parts. Inductive coupling uses magnetic induction to transfer power and data over an air gap. Yes, it is a kind of very short range wireless technology that also enables power transfer.
In this series of blogs on inductive coupling, we can explore various use cases of inductive coupling in complex automation. Today, let’s see how inductive coupling compares with traditional slip-ring mechanism.
Slip-rings, also known as rotary connectors, are typically used in areas of the machine where one part rotates and other part of the machine remains stationary. For example, an indexing table or turn table where stations on the indexing table need power and I/O but the table rotates through full 360°, hence standard cable solutions are ineffective. A slip ring could be installed at the base of the table.
Since, slip rings are electromechanical devices, in the long term they are subject to wearing out. Unfortunately, the signs of wear are not evident unless one day there is no power to the table. An inductive coupling solution eliminates all the hassle of the mechanical parts. With non-contact inductive coupling, the base coupler could be mounted at the base of the table and the remote coupler could be mounted on the rotating part of the table. Slip rings are susceptible to noise and vibration because they are electromechanical devices, whereas inductive couplers are not because there is no contact between the base and the remote. In fact, the turn table shown above uses an inductive coupler.
Inductive coupler, typically have IP67 rating for the housing are not affected by dirt or water, are immune to vibrations, and most important they are contact free so no maintenance is required unless you hammer one out. Learn more about Balluff inductive couplers: www.balluff.us.
At this point it is pretty clear that RFID is a fairly simple identification solution that involves a tag, antenna, and processor. The tag holds the information that is critical to the application. That information could be a very brief identifying number, sometimes called a license plate, and usually consists of 4 to 12 Bytes of data. Or, the application may require the tag to hold all the information about the product being manufactured such as build data, process data, or lineage data. In this case, there are tags with up to 128 Kilobytes of available storage. The scenarios above help to answer the question: “when do I use IO-Link RFID?”
A working robot is a happy robot. By adding flexible tooling or quick-change tooling to the end-effector of a robot you can have one arm perform multiple functions and keep idle arms to a minimum, increasing their value and “happiness.” Multiple products are out there to allow for this, however 
What’s the deal with cable dress packs… they look like really bad suspenders sometimes… you see them, you don’t like how they look, but you need it to keep your pants on… I guarantee that robots don’t like these things either… And with all that flexing something in there will fail regularly. There are some great technologies to reduce the sensor cables running on the arm and add flexibility and they are supported by the open standard IO-Link (discussed in other posts 
