That is the maximum distance between an IO-Link master port and an IO-Link device using a standard prox cable. Can this length be extended? Sure, there are IO-Link repeaters you can use to lengthen the distance, but is there an advantage and is it worth the headache?
I hope you like doing some math, because the maximum distance is based on the baud rate of the IO-Link device, the current consumption of the IO-Link device and finally the cross section of the conductors in the cabling. Now throw all that into a formula and you can determine the maximum distance you can achieve. Once that is calculated, are you done? No. Longer cables and repeaters add latency to the IO-Link data transfer, so you may need to slow down the IO-Link master’s port cycle time due to the delay.
Luckily, there is a better and easier solution than repeaters and the sacrifice of the data update rate — Single Pair Ethernet (SPE).
SPE is being discussed in all the major communication special interest groups, so it makes sense that its being discussed within the IO-Link Consortium. Why? A couple of key factors: cable lengths and updated speeds. By using SPE, we gain the Ethernet cable length advantage. So, instead of being limited to 20 meters, your IO-Link cabling could stretch to 100 meters! Imagine the opportunities that opens in industrial applications. It is possible that even longer runs will be achievable. With 10 Mbit/s speed, to start, the update rate between IO-Link devices and the IO-Link master could be less than 0.1 millisecond.
Latency has been the Achilles heal in using IO-Link in high-speed applications, but this could eliminate that argument. It will still be IO-Link, the point-to-point communication protocol (master-to-device), but the delivery method would change. Using SPE would require new versions of IO-Links masters, with either all SPE ports or a combination of SPE and standard IO-Link ports. The cabling would also change from our standard prox cables to hybrid cables, containing a single twist Ethernet pair with two additional conductors for 24 volts DC. We may even see some single channel converts, that convert standard IO-Link to SPE and vice versa.
There likely would have been pushback if this was discussed just five or ten years ago, but today, with new technology being released regularly, I doubt we see much resistance. We consumers are ready for this. We are already asking for the benefits of SPE and IO-Link SPE may be able to provide those advantages.
For more information, visit www.balluff.com.
3 Replies to “Is IO-Link with Single Pair Ethernet the Future?”